Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:11:24 -0800 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? |
| |
* Bernd Schubert (bernd-schubert@gmx.de) wrote: > Er, you mean /proc/fs/reiserfs/{partition}/on-disk-super?
Yup.
> bernd@bathl ~>grep attrs_cleared /proc/fs/reiserfs/hda6/on-disk-super > flags: 1[attrs_cleared]
> > 2) does mount -o attrs ... make a difference? > > Yes, 2.6.13 now makes the same trouble. No difference with 2.6.15.3. > I played with mount -o noattrs, this makes no difference with 2.6.13, but has > some effects to 2.6.15.3. Creating files in /var/run is possible again, > lsattr gives "lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags > on /var/run", but deleting files in /var/run is still impossible (still > rather bad for the init-scripts).
Yes, that's what I thought. There's still some backward logic in there. noattrs vs. attrs triggers whether the code path that's patched in 2.6.15.3 is taken. I'll dig a bit more, but hopefully the reiserfs folks can fix this for us.
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |