lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation
Date
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 22:03, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > I don't think you really want to open a full scale "is the oom killer needed"
> > thread. Check the archives - there have been some going on for months.
> >
> > But I think we can agree that together with mbind the oom killer is pretty
> > useless, can't we?
>
> Excellent points.
>
> I approve this patch.

I think it should be put into 2.6.16. Andrew?

I had the small objection about adding static noinline, but it's really not important
and the patch can be used as it.

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-08 22:24    [W:0.134 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site