Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:59:10 +0100 | From | Cedric Le Goater <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] VPIDs: vpid/pid conversion in VPID enabled case |
| |
Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>> I think the "child reaper" question is not related to the (container,pid) >> approach or the vpid approach. This is another question on who is the >> parent of a container and how does it behaves. > > it is related. How reaps the last process in container when it dies? > what does waitpid() return?
The current init sigchild handler does that very well and is also pid friendly :)
>> We have choosen to first follow a simple "path", complete pid isolation >> being the main constraint : a container is created by exec'ing a >> process in it. > > Why to exec? It was asked already some times...
Just restarting the thread on how a container should be created ...
C. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |