Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:19:02 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 19:59 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > I guess reasonable is a subjective term. For instance, I've seen quite > a few people vehemently against adding new ioctls to the kernel and > yet you'll be adding quite a few for /dev/snapshot. I'm just of the > same mind as Nigel in that it makes the most sense to me that the > majority of the suspend/hibernation process to be in the kernel.
No one is saying that ANY new ioctls are bad, just that the KISS principle of engineering dictates that it's bad design to use ioctls where a simple read/write to a sysfs file will do.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |