Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:23:19 -0800 (PST) | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Mark Lord wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Po 06-02-06 09:49:15, Mark Lord wrote: > >>> I'm not sure if we want to save full image of memory. Saving most-used > >>> caches only seems to work fairly well. > >> No, it sucks. My machines take forever to become usable on resume > >> with the current method. But dumping full image of memory will need > >> compression to keep that from being sluggish as well. > > > > Are you sure? This changed recently, be sure to set > > /sys/power/image_size. > > No such pathname in 2.6.15 (the latest released kernel).
_recently_. It's in 2.6.16-rc1 and later.
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |