Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:01:12 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support. |
| |
On So 04-02-06 11:20:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi Pavel. > > On Friday 03 February 2006 21:44, Pavel Machek wrote: > > [Pavel is willing to take patches, as his cooperation with Rafael > > shows, but is scared by both big patches and series of 10 small > > patches he does not understand. He likes patches removing code.] > > Assuming you're refering to the patches that started this thread, what don't > you understand? I'm more than happy to explain.
For "suspend2: modules support", it is pretty clear that I do not need or want that complexity. But for "refrigerator improvements", I did not understand which parts are neccessary because of suspend2 vs. swsusp differences, and if there is simpler way towards the same goal. (And thanks for a stress hint...) Pavel
-- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |