Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:07:04 +0100 | From | Marc Koschewski <> | Subject | Re: Wanted: hotfixes for -mm kernels |
| |
* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> [2006-02-02 16:45:52 -0500]:
> On 2/2/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 15:00 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > Most -mm kernels have small but critical bugs that are found shortly > > > after release. Patches for these are posted on linux-kernel but > > > they aren't made available on kernel.org until the next -mm release. > > > > > > Would it be possible to create a hotfix/ directory for each -mm > > > release and put those patches there? A README could explain that > > > the fixes are untested. At least people reading the files could > > > see an issue exists even if they're not brave enough to try the > > > patch. :) > > > > I doubt it - mm is an experimental kernel, hotfixes only make sense for > > production stuff. It moves too fast. > > > > A better question is what does -mm give you that mainline does not, that > > causes you to want to "stabilize" a specific -mm version? > > > > Some people just run -mm so the hotfixes/* would help them to get > their boxes running until the next -mm without having to hunt through > LKML for bugs already reported/fixed. This will allow better testing > coverage because most obvious bugs are caught almost immediately and > then people can continue using -mm to find more stuff.
... that's just why I so often wish to have a -git tree, Andrew. ;)
Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |