Messages in this thread | | | From | Andreas Schwab <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4 | Date | Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:05:18 +0100 |
| |
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> writes:
> Hm, how about "inline"? GCC also just keeps quiet when a function (or > prototype) is written as: > > inline static int foo(int bar);
"iniline" is not a storage-class specifier, thus it should be handled like "const" etc.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |