lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
Date
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> writes:

> Hm, how about "inline"? GCC also just keeps quiet when a function (or
> prototype) is written as:
>
> inline static int foo(int bar);

"iniline" is not a storage-class specifier, thus it should be handled like
"const" etc.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-25 11:07    [W:0.324 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site