Messages in this thread | | | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) | Date | Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:22:34 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Saturday 25 February 2006 09:53, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > 2) shrink_all_memory() should be fixed. It should not really return > > > > if there are more pages freeable. > > > > > > Well, that would be a long-run solution. However, until it's fixed we > > > can use a workaround IMHO. ;-) > > > > Isn't trying to free as much memory as you can the wrong solution anyway? > > I mean, that only means that the poor system has more pages to fault back > > in at resume time, before the user can even begin to think about doing > > anything useful. You might be able to say "Every machine that suspend2 > > works on, swsusp works on", but the later will be a pretty sad definition > > of works! > > We are trying to catch a bug here. suspend2 or not, it is a bug and it > should be fixed (or at least understood). > > [Also please try to tone down your messages. Your suspend2 may be more > user-friendly, you do not want to start that flamewar again, do you? > Saying "don't bother fixing that" is not nice thing to do.]
What's the bug?
Regards,
Nigel [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |