Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:30:46 -0800 | From | Joel Becker <> | Subject | Re: GFS2 Filesystem [13/16] |
| |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 06:50:59PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > --- a/fs/Kconfig > > +++ b/fs/Kconfig > > @@ -883,8 +884,6 @@ config CONFIGFS_FS > > Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the > > same system. One is not a replacement for the other. > > > > - If unsure, say N. > > - > > Why? Most users probably still want configfs_fs=N.
What version is this patch against? This line was removed from mainline a while ago. As to why it was removed, the discussion happened back then. Basically, if something requires CONFIGFS_FS (eg, OCFS2) and is a module, then a user is asked whether they want configfs as a module or built-in. Text saying "say N" is completely incorrect there.
Joel
--
"If the human brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple that we could not." - W. A. Clouston
Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |