Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.15-rt17 | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:17:47 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 17:50 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote: > I didn't know anyone looked at my patch! I am ofcourse happy about it :-)
Was just delayed due to other work in progress.
> That was why I had _reversed_ the lock ordering relative to normal in the > original patch: First lock task->pi_lock. Assign lock. Lock > lock->wait_lock. Then unlock task->pi_lock. Now it is safe to refer to > lock. To avoid deadlocks I used _raw_spin_trylock() when locking the 2. > lock.
Stupid me. I messed that one up. Should show up in the next -rt
Thanks
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |