Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:24:45 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
Hi!
> > It is doable - I'm doing it now, but am thinking about reverting part of the > > code to use pbes again. If you're going to look at using bitmaps in place of > > pbes, me changing would be a waste of time. Do you want me to hold off for a > > while? (I'll happily do that, as I have far more than enough to keep me > > occupied at the moment anyway). > > Well, I'd say so. :-) > > Frankly, I didn't think of dropping PBEs right now, but in the long run > that's worth considering, IMO. The advantage of PBEs is that they are easy to > handle in the assembly parts, but apart from this they are a bit wasteful > (not very much, though).
Of course it will depend on what patch looks like, but changing assembly parts is hard -- you have to change all the architectures, and better not make any mistake.
> The fact that we use page flags to store some suspend/resume-related > information is a big disadvantage in my view, and I'd like to get rid of that > in the future. In principle we could use a bitmap, or rather two of them, > to store the same information independently of the page flags, and > if we use bitmaps for this purpose, we can use them also instead of > PBEs.
Well, we "only" use 2 bits... :-). Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |