Messages in this thread | | | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:44:48 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Monday 20 February 2006 20:15, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 11:10 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > > Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any > > > consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough > > > argument for merging? > > > > It sure isn't the argument, you are right. My main concern here is to > > throw away a working implementation and starting over from the scratch, > > instead of solving these problems. > > Take it up with the author for not working more closely with the kernel > developers while Suspend2 was being developed, AFAICT a LOT of this > could have been avoided with better communication.
Perhaps, but maybe there's more going on here than that.
Nigel
-- See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |