Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:17:56 +0100 | From | Matthias Hensler <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) |
| |
Hi.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:56:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Po 20-02-06 10:47:28, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > I do not think that Suspend 2 needs 14000 lines for that, the core > > is much smaller. But besides, _not_ saving the pagecache is a really > > _bad_ idea. I expect to have my system back after resume, in the > > same state I had left it prior to suspend. I really do not like it > > how it is done by Windows, it is just ugly to have a slowly > > responding system after resume, because all caches and buffers are > > gone. > > That's okay, swsusp already saves configurable ammount of pagecache.
What about uswsusp?
Regards, Matthias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |