lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
    On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:49:37PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > > Yep, if you do it all in userspace, this vanishes. 340 lines down.
    > >
    > > And you gain? Let's try not to be too biased :).
    >
    > I gain 340 less lines to review. For me to review, for akpm to review,
    > and for Linus to review. That's important.

    Pavel, if you mean that the userspace code will not be reviewed to
    standards the kernel code is, kill uswsusp _NOW_ before it does too
    much damage. Unreliable suspend eats filesystems for breakfast. The
    other userspace components of the kernels services are either optional
    (udev) or not that important (alsa).

    OG.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-20 18:08    [W:3.337 / U:0.416 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site