Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:42:54 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Which is simpler? |
| |
> Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes: > > >> Ah, and now the part I really like, some hard numbers: > >> swsusp takes between 26 and 30 seconds to suspend (in my four tries: 26, > >> 30, 28, 26) and between 35 and 45 seconds to resume (35, 45, 39, 37). > >> > >> Suspend 2 does suspend in around 14-16 seconds, and resume in 18 to 21. > >> > >> That is factor 2! > > > > Does that include time to boot resume kernel? It will not be that > > dramatic with that time included, and it is only fair to include > > it. Anyway uswsusp solves that issue. > > On my old ThinkPad, the difference is more like a factor of 3 to 4 - > from the moment I press the power button until X is up and running.
Well, yep, it really depends on CPU/harddisk.
Can you try code from suspend.sf.net? It should be as fast as suspend2.
Pavel
-- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |