lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

> Besides, the people who inserted the DRM code explicitly gave you
> permission to modify it, so the whole point is moot. There's no
> "circumvention".

Yes, it is mostly clear, and indeed GPL3 seems a little bit over
engineered, but that doesn't mean that GPL2 could not have any
loopholes:

1. Release a kernel with builtin DRM for video. (For example HDCP [1])
Such DRM implementation is released under the GPL2 by copyright
holder A.

2. Distribute a modified kernel without DRM. Copyright holder A gave
you permission to do so, by the GPL2, everything is OK.

3. People can backup videos from copyright holder B using the modified
kernel.

4. Copyright holder B can sue you under the DMCA, for circumventing an
effective technological measure. It doesn't matter whatever license
copyright holder A gave you.

Regards,

Emilio

Footnotes:
[1] High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection. Currently you would
never get a license for a GPL implementation, but it's used as an
hypothetical example.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-02 18:44    [W:0.202 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site