Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:24:03 +0100 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
Joerg Schilling schrieb am 2006-02-02:
> Jim Crilly <jim@why.dont.jablowme.net> wrote: > > > Every other method to access those devices uses the device name, i.e. > > mount, fsck, etc, so why should cdrecord be different? > > inadequateness on Linux did force libscg to go this way. > > The current method used by libscg is well established since 10 years. > > Now Linux likes to confuse people by trying to enforce a completely > incompatible access method. > > Note that I need to avoid unneeded efforts and for this reason, I need to wait > 5 years until is is forseable that a recent incompatible change in Linux will > survive long enough to spent time on it.
It is incompatible? Looks like the code is already implemented and ATA: is in the regular device name space (where RSCSI and the other options reside as well).
-- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |