Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:52:43 -0500 (EST) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3 |
| |
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 05:35:08PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 08:27 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > Nah, I don't think it's a good idea. James's patch should work just > > > fine. > > > > another option is to have a "kill list" which you put the thing on, and > > then wake up a thread. only 2 pointers in the object ;( > > Hm, that's almost what James's patch is trying to do. Care to mock up a > patch that shows this? It might be a simpler solution.
It won't work. You might have to do 2 put_device calls on the same structure. That's why I suggested the "pending puts" counter; something can't go on a list more than once.
Alan Stern
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |