Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:17:28 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter |
| |
>> > I have noticed that the new ...at() system calls are named in what >> > appears to be a completely haphazard fashion. In Unix system calls, >> > an f- prefix means it operates on a file descriptor; the -at suffix (a >> > prefix would have been more consistent, but oh well) similarly >> > indicates it operates on a (directory fd, pathname) pair. >> > >> shmat operates on dirfd/pathname? > >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces? >
chownfn maybe. (fd + name)
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |