Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:44:17 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Well I don't see any benchmark numbers in the original patch. Just an > assertion that it "should" help something. >
The regression was in a Ken's commercial database benchmark. I couldn't reproduce it but presumably it did fix it otherwise Ken would would have piped up?
> I'm more inclined to revert it and not add the sysctl (ugh) until we have a > good reason to do so. >
If you revert this then Ken's database benchmark gets worse. Hence the sysctl.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |