Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:00:10 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [rfc][patch] sched: remove smpnice |
| |
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > I don't think either of these issues warrant abandoning smpnice. The > first is highly unlikely to occur on real systems and the second is just > an example of the patch doing its job (maybe too officiously). I don't > think users would notice either on real systems. > > Even if you pull it from 2.6.16 rather than upgrading it with my patch > can you please leave both in -mm?
Yes, I have done that. I currently have:
sched-restore-smpnice.patch sched-modified-nice-support-for-smp-load-balancing.patch sched-cleanup_task_activated.patch sched-alter_uninterruptible_sleep_interactivity.patch sched-make_task_noninteractive_use_sleep_type.patch sched-dont_decrease_idle_sleep_avg.patch sched-include_noninteractive_sleep_in_idle_detect.patch sched-new-sched-domain-for-representing-multi-core.patch sched-fix-group-power-for-allnodes_domains.patch
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |