Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement Swap Prefetching v23 | Date | Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:37:57 +1100 |
| |
On Friday 10 February 2006 16:32, Nick Piggin wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > Just so it's clear I understand, is this what you (both) had in mind? > > Inline so it's not built for !CONFIG_SWAP_PREFETCH > > Close...
> > +inline void lru_cache_add_tail(struct page *page) > > Is this inline going to do what you intend?
I don't care if it's actually inlined, but the subtleties of compilers is way beyond me. All it positively achieves is silencing the unused function warning so I had hoped it meant that function was not built. I tend to be wrong though...
> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock); > > > + add_page_to_inactive_list_tail(zone, page); > > spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
Thanks!
Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |