Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.15-rt16 | From | Clark Williams <> | Date | Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:51:34 -0600 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:39 -0600, Clark Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 13:32 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > I'm still curious to what's happening with your kernel. I'm currently > > > running my x86_64 (typing right now on it) with CONFIG_SMP=n and > > > CONFIG_LATENCY=y. I know you probably sent a config before, but could > > > you send it to me again. (probably best to send it to me off list) > > > > yeah, it's been gnawing at me too. Not really stopping me, but I've seen > > it happen on two Athlon64's (3000+ and 3400+). > > > > I'll send the .config offlist. > > Clark, > > Could you make sure that your modules in the initrd that you use are the > ones created with the LATENCY_TRACE option. After converting all the > modules into compiled in options, I successfully booted the kernel. So > you might have an incompatibility with the modules in initrd, when you > turn on LATENCY_TRACE.
Did you ever duplicated the failure?
I'm fairly certain that the initrd contains the appropriate modules, since I regenerate the initrd each time I generate a new kernel, but I'll go back and verify.
I'll also convert modules to compiled in and see if that makes a difference.
Clark
-- Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |