Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:26:10 +1100 | Subject | Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency | From | Herbert Xu <> |
| |
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:32:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > update: with all of Herbert's fixes i havent gotten these yet - so maybe > the validator was not producing a false positive, but perhaps the > inet6_destroy_sock()->sk_dst_reset() thing was causing the messages?
Maybe. But in that case shouldn't the validator show that code-path?
Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |