lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix?
From
Date
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 18:41 -0800, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0000, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
>
> Is this the reason why you are saying your system has unsynchronized TSC?
> Some where in this thread, you mentioned that Lost ticks happen even
> when you use "notsc"
>
> This sounds to me as a different problem. Can you send us the output
> of /proc/interrupts?

/proc/interrupts on kernel 2.6.18
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9384&action=view
dmesg w/o notsc kernel 2.6.19-rc4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9385&action=view
/proc/interrupts kernel 2.6.19-rc4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9386&action=view
dmesg w/ notsc kernel 2.6.19-rc4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9387&action=view
/proc/interrupts kernel 2.6.19-rc4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9388&action=view
list of interrupts give by windows XP
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=9389&action=view

Let me know, if I can help on something.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M.B.
[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-01 02:49    [W:0.222 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site