lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] handle ext3 directory corruption better
Another expectation is that after the fsck, you won't loose any more 
data that you could access by mounting the damaged filesystem. There
are a lot of horror stories out there of people only having a slightly
damaged fs, and after a fsck, they lost a lot more data.

Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Nice... can you run the same tool against fsck, too?
>
> I did that some time ago, with less evil tool, and got some
> interesting results.
>
> (Expectation is that no matter how you corrupt fs, fsck will get it
> back to consistent state...)
> Pavel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-31 14:39    [W:0.108 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site