Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:43:20 -0800 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices |
| |
vatsa wrote: > C. Paul Menage's container patches > > Provides a generic heirarchial ... > > Consensus/Debated Points > ------------------------ > > Consensus: > ... > - Dont support heirarchy for now
Looks like this item can be dropped from the concensus ... ;).
I for one would recommend getting the hierarchy right from the beginning.
Though I can appreciate that others were trying to "keep it simple" and postpone dealing with such complications. I don't agree.
Such stuff as this deeply affects all that sits on it. Get the basic data shape presented by the kernel-user API right up front. The rest will follow, much easier.
Good review of the choices - thanks.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |