Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:14:13 -0700 | From | Stephen Hemminger <> | Subject | Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper |
| |
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:24:58 +0200 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > > > i've found: > > > > __create_workqueue > > queue_work > > > if you change the queue_work() calls to schedule_work() (and drop it's > first argument) and just remove the create_workqueue() entirely, does it > work then? (probably also need to remove destroy_workqueue() call) > if so, that's the real solution on the ndiswrapper side... > >
Or maybe do equivalent delayed function calls by using a kthread. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |