Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:17:08 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Use next_balance instead of last_balance |
| |
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hmmmm... We change the point at which we calculate the interval relative to > > load balancing. So move it after the load balance. This also avoids having > > to do the calculation if the sched_domain has not expired. > > That still doesn't take into account if the CPU goes idle/busy during > the interval.
How does the current version take that into account? As far as I can tell we take the busy / idle stuation at the point in time when rebalance_tick() is called. We do not track whever the cpu gues idle/busy in the interval. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |