Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:42:21 -0500 (Central Daylight Time) | From | Dwayne Grant McConnell <> | Subject | Re: Correct way to format spufs file output. |
| |
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 20 October 2006 15:54, Dwayne Grant McConnell wrote: > > I think %0xllx is the way to go. I would even advocate changing > > signal1_type and signal2_type unless it is actually too dangerous. > > There is absolutely no reason why these should be hexadecimal, they > are basically implementing a bool. > > > Is there even a case where changing from %llu to %0xllx would break things? > > Perhaps with the combination of a old library with a new kernel? > > Right, a library or some script that has been written assuming there > is no leading 0x.
Okay. Thanks for considering it. I'll leave the %llu as is.
-- Dwayne Grant McConnell <decimal@us.ibm.com> Lotus Notes Mail: Dwayne McConnell [Mail]/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Lotus Notes Calendar: Dwayne McConnell [Calendar]/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |