lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] OOM killer meets userspace headers
    On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:12:19AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
    > >On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:05:53AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > >
    > >>>+#define OOM_ADJUST_MIN (-16)
    > >>>+#define OOM_ADJUST_MAX 15
    > >>
    > >>Why do you need the () for the -ves?
    > >
    > >
    > >-16 is two tokens. Not that someone is going to do huge arithmetic with
    > >OOM adjustments and screwup himself, but still...
    >
    > How can they screw themselves up? AFAIKS, the - directly to the left
    > of the literal will bind more tightly than any other valid operator.

    Hmmm... c.l.c lists two reasons: a) =- being synonym of -= in pre-ANSI
    days, and b) fat fingers

    #define EOF -1
    while ((c = getchar()) != 3 EOF)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-18 21:27    [W:4.383 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site