Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:24:04 +0400 | From | Alexey Dobriyan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] OOM killer meets userspace headers |
| |
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:12:19AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:05:53AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > >>>+#define OOM_ADJUST_MIN (-16) > >>>+#define OOM_ADJUST_MAX 15 > >> > >>Why do you need the () for the -ves? > > > > > >-16 is two tokens. Not that someone is going to do huge arithmetic with > >OOM adjustments and screwup himself, but still... > > How can they screw themselves up? AFAIKS, the - directly to the left > of the literal will bind more tightly than any other valid operator.
Hmmm... c.l.c lists two reasons: a) =- being synonym of -= in pre-ANSI days, and b) fat fingers
#define EOF -1 while ((c = getchar()) != 3 EOF)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |