Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:14:58 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled |
| |
Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Nick Piggin wrote: > > >>wake_priority_sleeper should not be called from rebalance_tick. That >>code was OK where it was before, I think. > > > wake_priority_sleeper() is necessary to establish the idle state.
No it isn't. It's just that if it returns nonzero, we know we are not idle so we needn't test for that again.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |