lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>
>>wake_priority_sleeper should not be called from rebalance_tick. That
>>code was OK where it was before, I think.
>
>
> wake_priority_sleeper() is necessary to establish the idle state.

No it isn't. It's just that if it returns nonzero, we know we are not
idle so we needn't test for that again.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-18 21:17    [W:0.046 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site