Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:39:33 +0200 | From | Jakob Oestergaard <> | Subject | Re: Bandwidth Allocations under CFQ I/O Scheduler |
| |
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:04:57PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: ... > > So you could say you want your database to consume no more than 50% > > of disk and have your mp3 player get a minimum of 10%. Of course, > > that doesn't say anything about what the time slices are, or what > > latencies you can expect (1s out of every 10, or 100ms out of every > > 1000?). > > As I wrote previously, both a percentage and bandwidth along with > desired latency make sense.
The fundamental problem I see, is, that while you can easily measure and limit the bandwidth, you cannot really make bandwidth guarantees.
All the rest sounds great in my ears :)
--
/ jakob
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |