Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:15:24 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set |
| |
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:00:25 +1000 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes: > > > If the drivers doesn't care and if it makes no difference to performance > > then just delete the call to pci_set_mwi(). > > > > But if MWI _does_ make a difference to performance then we should tell > > someone that it isn't working rather than silently misbehaving? > > That sounds like we need a printk inside pci_set_mwi then, rather than > adding a printk to every single caller. >
I think so, yes. That's a good solution to a lot of these things. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |