Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs | From | Frédéric Riss <> | Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:08:15 +0200 |
| |
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 08:33 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit : > > If we do this we probably should at least key this of some DMI > > identification for the mac mini.. > > No. That would be silly. > > Having _conditional_ code is not only bigger, it's orders of magnitude > more complex and likely to break. It's much better to say: "We know at > least one machine needs this" than it is to say "We know machine X needs > this", because the latter has extra complexity that just doesn't buy you > anything. > > It's much better to treat everybody the same, if that works. That way, you > don't have different code-paths.
So what's the plan? Should/Will the ACPI guys remove the bit-preserving change brought in with the latest ACPICA merge?
Fred.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |