Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency | Date | Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:09:01 +0100 |
| |
On Saturday 07 January 2006 01:17, David S. Miller wrote:
> > I mean something like this patch:
Looks like a good idea to me.
I always disliked the per chain spinlocks even for other hash tables like TCP/UDP multiplex - it would be much nicer to use a much smaller separately hashed lock table and save cache. In this case the special case of using a one entry only lock hash table makes sense.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |