Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7 | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:28:58 -0500 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 09:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > > > I'm not sure how much work it would be to break out > > CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE as a separate patch. > > could you check out the 2.6.15-rc7 version of the latency tracer i > uploaded to: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/ > > could test it by e.g. trying to reproduce the same VM latency as in the > -rt tree. [the two zlib patches are needed if you are using 4K stacks, > mcount increases stack footprint.]
Ingo,
Would you mind submitting this for 2.6.16? We already have one case where it would have caught a regression in time for 2.6.15, so IMHO this would be a great addition to "Kernel hacking".
I have had absolutely no problems running this with 2.6.15-rc7, it works perfectly, as it has in the -rt tree for ages.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |