lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
From
Date
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 09:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure how much work it would be to break out
> > CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE as a separate patch.
>
> could you check out the 2.6.15-rc7 version of the latency tracer i
> uploaded to:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/
>
> could test it by e.g. trying to reproduce the same VM latency as in the
> -rt tree. [the two zlib patches are needed if you are using 4K stacks,
> mcount increases stack footprint.]

Ingo,

Would you mind submitting this for 2.6.16? We already have one case
where it would have caught a regression in time for 2.6.15, so IMHO this
would be a great addition to "Kernel hacking".

I have had absolutely no problems running this with 2.6.15-rc7, it works
perfectly, as it has in the -rt tree for ages.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-06 21:31    [W:0.194 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site