Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response | Date | Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:33:09 +1100 |
| |
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:13 am, Peter Williams wrote: > If the plugsched patches were included in -mm we could get wider testing > of alternative scheduling mechanisms. But I think it will take a lot of > testing of the new schedulers to allay fears that they may introduce new > problems of their own.
When I first generated plugsched and posted it to lkml for inclusion in -mm it was blocked as having no chance of being included by both Ingo and Linus and I doubt they've changed their position since then. As you're well aware this is why I gave up working on it and let you maintain it since then. Obviously I thought it was a useful feature or I wouldn't have worked on it.
Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |