lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sysinterface
On Čt 05-01-06 17:28:28, Preece Scott-PREECE wrote:
>
> Not sure if this is the kind of example you're looking for, but...
>
> We do have devices that may need to stay alive even though the processor has been suspended - for instance, we keep the display backlight on for human-useful periods following the last keypress, but most of the system can be shut down as soon as the work driven from the keypress is finished. The display needs to be able to maintain itself without the processor's help.
>

No, not that one. That would be more like processor Cx states on PC.

Are there any devices that have multiple "off" modes with
different "latency before device gets functional" values, where we
actually want to use more than one "off" mode?
Pavel

--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-05 23:35    [W:0.904 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site