Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:53:39 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/15] Ubuntu patch sync |
| |
>> > These patches are just attempts to merge code from the ubuntu kernel tree. >> > This is most of the differences between our tree and stock code (not >> > necessarily all differences, since we do have a lot of external drivers >> > pulled in). >> >> Why not submit them too? > >Because neither I nor Ubuntu maintains them as upstream. I would rather >leave it to the upstream authors of those drivers (e.g. rt2400, rt2500, >unionfs, etc.) to submit their own code to Linus.
The maximum where unionfs should IMO go ATM is -mm, because it still has refcount issues and occassional crashes.
rt2400/etc is a bit more tricky. There exist several versions and they all have different levels of evolution :-/ Group 1: - rt* from ralink.com.tw Group 2: - rt2400,rt2500,rt2570 "1.1.0" from sf.net/projects/rt2400 - rt2x00 "2.0", also sf.net/projects/rt2400
Nevertheless, I do have rt* 1.1 and 2.0, and unionfs in my patchset...
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |