Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:30:14 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch |
| |
>> I agree. I think that one previous -stable patch version should always >> be listed there, even if we think that 2.6.N is stable. :) > >I don't at all. If we do that, people will assume that they need to >wait till 2.6.N.1 before trying that kernel (as it wouldn't be "stable" >otherwise.) So no one will test it, to really generate the bug reports >that we need to get to that .1 release. > >Or should we just throw out a .1 release with the first simple patch >that comes along just to make the kernel.org page update properly? I >don't think so... >
Or call the "2.6.X" as "2.6.X.0", so they got at least a clue that this is becoming .1
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |