lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch
>> I agree.  I think that one previous -stable patch version should always
>> be listed there, even if we think that 2.6.N is stable. :)
>
>I don't at all. If we do that, people will assume that they need to
>wait till 2.6.N.1 before trying that kernel (as it wouldn't be "stable"
>otherwise.) So no one will test it, to really generate the bug reports
>that we need to get to that .1 release.
>
>Or should we just throw out a .1 release with the first simple patch
>that comes along just to make the kernel.org page update properly? I
>don't think so...
>

Or call the "2.6.X" as "2.6.X.0", so they got at least a clue that this is
becoming .1


Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-05 08:32    [W:0.401 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site