lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Development tree, PLEASE?

> Lots of things still out there depend on devfs. So now if I want to develop my
> kmod on recent kernels I have to be in the business of maintaining a lot more
> userland stuff, like mkinitrd, installers, etc. that have come to rely on
> devfs.

Just like the OSS-ALSA/e100 debate: If there IS something that you
do not like [something that requires devfs], why has NO ONE objected?
(Quoting Greg: "and I have not heard a single peep out of anyone about the
email titled "Subject: devfs going away, last chance to complain"") Not to
forget there is ndevfs if you really need it.


Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-20 17:43    [W:0.398 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site