lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > I wasn't proposing fully dynamic slabs, just a better default set
    > of slabs based on real measurements instead of handwaving (like
    > the power of two slabs seemed to have been generated). With separate
    > sets for 32bit and 64bit.
    >
    > Also the goal wouldn't be better performance, but just less waste of memory.
    >
    > I suspect such a move could save much more memory on small systems
    > than any of these "make fundamental debugging tools a CONFIG" patches ever.

    I misunderstood what you were proposing. Sorry. It makes sense to measure
    it.

    Pekka
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-02 16:12    [W:6.790 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site