Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:36:24 -0800 | From | Pete Zaitcev <> | Subject | Re: need for packed attribute |
| |
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:26:17 +0000, Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:20:06AM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > P.S. I am repeating myself as Katon, but I am yet to see why any of > > this matters. Neither Russell nor Oliver ever presented a case where > > an unpacked struct caused breakage in USB. > > If you would like to refresh your memory (which is obviously faulty) > you'll see that my involvement in this thread was merely to answer > a simple question about structure sizes.
Isn't it exactly what I just wrote, and you quoted?
> It was not a bug report about USB breaking. Therefore, I have no > case to present.
The thread started with Oliver posting a patch. And later, he appealed to your authority.
It seems that we both are saying that there's no problem, no case, no nothing.
-- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |