Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: [patch] Reset the high water marks in CPUs pcp list | From | Rohit Seth <> | Date | Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:34:19 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 16:49 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I don't see that there would be any problems with playing with the > ->high and ->low numbers so long as they are a reasonable multiple > of batch, however I would question the merit of setting the high > watermark of the cold queue to ->batch + 1 (should really stay at > 2*batch IMO). >
I agree that this watermark is little low at this point. But that is mainly because currently we don't have a way to drain the pcps for low memory conditions. Once I add that support, I will bump up the high water marks.
Can you share a list of specific workloads that you ran earlier while fixing these numbers.
-rohit
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |