Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:38:54 -0400 | From | Jon Smirl <> | Subject | Re: State of Linux graphics |
| |
On 9/1/05, Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org> wrote: > Not at all. > > We're pursuing two courses of action right now, that are not mutually > exclusive. > > Jon Smirl's argument is that we can satisfy both needs simultaneously > with a GL only strategy, and that doing two is counter productive, > primarily on available resource grounds. > > My point is that I don't think the case has (yet) been made to put all > eggs into that one basket, and that some of the arguments presented for > that course of action don't hold together.
We're not putting all of our eggs in one basket, you keep forgetting that we already have a server that supports all of the currently existing hardware. The question is where do we want to put our future eggs.
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |