Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: GFS, what's remaining | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:49:18 +0100 |
| |
On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 03:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > - Why the kernel needs two clustered fileystems
So delete reiserfs4, FAT, VFAT, ext2, and all the other "junk".
> - Why GFS is better than OCFS2, or has functionality which OCFS2 cannot > possibly gain (or vice versa) > > - Relative merits of the two offerings
You missed the important one - people actively use it and have been for some years. Same reason with have NTFS, HPFS, and all the others. On that alone it makes sense to include.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |