Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:23:03 -0700 | From | Mike Waychison <> | Subject | Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum |
| |
Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Mike Waychison wrote: > >>enums in C are (de?)promoted to integral types under most conditions, so >>the type-checking is useless. > > > It's a warning in gcc afaik and spare should complain as well. >
Check again.
You must be thinking of another language.
Show me how you can get warnings out of this:
enum foo { FOO, };
static enum foo doit(enum foo bar) { int i = bar; return i; }
int main(void) { int i; i = doit(0); return 0; }
Mike Waychison - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |