Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [46/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 622-swapwriter.patch | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Fri, 08 Jul 2005 23:42:20 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 07:26, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:16 am, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > +struct io_info { > > > > + struct bio * sys_struct; > > > > + long block[PAGE_SIZE/512]; > > > > > > Aah, but for this you should use block_size(io_info->dev) instead. No > > > need to mess with sector sizes. Why is this long by the way? > > > PAGE_SIZE/512 is block size in bytes. > > > > No... it's the maximum number of blocks per page. Depending upon how > > the user has set the blocksize when they created the filesystem (in the > > case of filesystems), the number of blocks we use per page might be 1, > > 2, 4 or 8. > > > > MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE > > > It's long because a sector number is stored in it. > > > > sector_t?
Fixed. Ta.
Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |